app+csdk+docs: 修正上一轮最近邻2×的退化(颗粒/边沿台阶)——照片改为从160×120单级6×放大(官方ImageViewer同款),实时缓冲与csdk回退为插值2×;实测冷区|dx| 0.76×官方(更平滑),119单测全绿
This commit is contained in:
@@ -61,12 +61,13 @@ typedef struct mag160c_render_cfg_t {
|
||||
/* Brightness offset for the Android LUT base; the official app passes 0. */
|
||||
int lut_brightness;
|
||||
/* 1 = replicate pixels in the 160x120 -> 320x240 stage instead of interpolating.
|
||||
The official ANDROID path has no such stage at all (its SDK hands the app a
|
||||
160x120 bitmap which ImageViewer draws with a non-filtering paint = nearest),
|
||||
while the PC SDK's bilinear version fabricates an interleaved full/half
|
||||
amplitude column pattern at the sensor Nyquist - visible as extra fine stripes
|
||||
in the dark/cold regions. Measured on device: fine-scale cold-region stripe
|
||||
ratio vs the official 1.16-1.29x (bilinear) -> 1.00/0.93 (nearest). */
|
||||
Measured on device, this is the WRONG trade: replication halves the effective
|
||||
resolution (2-sensor-pixel granules, a coarse staircase along hot/cold edges,
|
||||
reported by the user), while the interpolation only adds a faint full/half
|
||||
amplitude column pattern at the sensor Nyquist. A consumer that can draw
|
||||
gray160 directly (like the Android app's photo path: one 6x bilinear step from
|
||||
the sensor grid) needs no intermediate stage at all and gets both right.
|
||||
Kept as a switch for experiments; leave 0. */
|
||||
int upscale_nearest;
|
||||
mag160c_render_ffc_cb_t ffc_cb;
|
||||
void *ffc_user;
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user